News

Salvation By Grace

What does it mean that salvation is by grace through faith?

salvation by grace

Salvation by grace through faith is at the heart of the Christian religion. “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast” (Ephesians 2:8–9). The statement has three parts— salvationgrace, and faith—and they are equally important. The three together constitute a basic tenet of Christianity.

The word salvation is defined as “the act of being delivered, redeemed, or rescued.” The Bible tells us that, since the fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, each person is born in sin inherited from Adam: “Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned” (Romans 5:12). Sin is what causes all of us to die. Sin separates us from God, and sin destines each person to eternal separation from Him in hell. What each of us needs is to be delivered from that fate. In other words, we need salvation from sin and its penalty.

How are we saved from sin? Most religions throughout history have taught that salvation is achieved by good works. Others teach that acts of contrition (saying we are sorry) along with living a moral life is the way to atone for our sin. Sorrow over sin is certainly valuable and necessary, but that alone will not save us from sin. We may repent of our sins, also valuable and necessary, and determine to never sin again, but salvation is not the result of good intentions. The road to hell, as the saying goes, is paved with good intentions. We may fill our lives with good works, but even one sin makes us a sinner in practice, and we are already sinners by nature. No matter how well-intentioned or “good” we may be, the fact is that we simply do not have the power or the goodness to overcome the sin nature we have inherited from Adam. We need something more powerful, and this is where grace comes in.

The grace of God is His undeserved favor bestowed on those He has called to salvation through His love (Ephesians 2:4–5). It is His grace that saves us from sin. We are “justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus” (Romans 3:24). Being justified, we are vindicated and determined to be sinless in the eyes of God. Our sin no longer separates us from Him and no longer sentences us to hell. Grace is not earned by any effort on our part; otherwise, it could not be called grace. Grace is free. If our good works earned salvation, then God would be obligated to pay us our due. But no one can earn heaven, and God’s blessings are not His obligation; they flow from His goodness and love. No matter how diligently we pursue works to earn God’s favor, we will fail. Our sin trips us up every time. “By the deeds of the law no flesh will be justified in His sight” (Romans 3:20, NKJV).

The means God has chosen to bestow His grace upon us is through faith. “Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see” (Hebrews 11:1). Salvation is obtained by faith in God’s Son, Jesus Christ, in what He has done—specifically, His death on the cross and His resurrection. But even faith is not something we generate on our own. Faith, as well as grace, is the gift of God (Ephesians 2:8). He bestows saving faith and saving grace upon us in order to redeem us from sin and deliver us from its consequences. So God saves us by His grace through the faith He gives us. Both grace and faith are gifts. “Salvation belongs to the LORD” (Psalm 3:8, ESV).

By grace, we receive the faith that enables us to believe that He has sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to die on the cross and provide the salvation we cannot achieve on our own. Jesus, as God in flesh, is the “author and perfecter of our faith” (Hebrews 12:2). Just like the author of a book creates it from scratch, Jesus Christ wrote the story of our redemption from beginning to end. “For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us to be adopted as his sons through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will—to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves” (Ephesians 1:4–6). The Lord died for our sins and rose for our justification, and He forgives, freely and fully, those who accept His gift of grace in Christ—and that acceptance comes through faith. This is the meaning of salvation by grace through faith.

FURTHER STUDIES 

Faith Alone, The Doctrine of Justification: What the Reformers Taught…and Why It Still Matters by Thomas SchreinerMore insights from your Bible study – Get Started with Logos Bible Software for Free!RELATED ARTICLE 

What does it mean that good works are the result of salvation?What does it mean to be saved by grace?Is salvation by grace plus works a false gospel?What is the meaning of Ephesians 2:8–9?Is salvation by faith alone, or by faith plus works?

Child Right Abuse

NEGLIGENCE AND IGNORANCE; THE COMMON CAUSES OF INCREASED CHILD RIGHT ABUSE IN RECENT TIMES.

It is more a cliché than appreciation of the truth and reality to say children are gifts from God when there exist in society a lot of manifest and latent activities that depreciate this natural value and threaten their dignity and existence.

Being a pupil teacher for five years, my encounter with children from the first time I handled pupils in Kindergarten (K.G) till my progression to the lower and upper primary and finally Junior High, I have come to appreciate by nurture and nature that children are like the popular cliché: garbage in, garbage out; whatever you invested into them is what they give back to you, even more than you did and also are really a blessing if handle with care.
In addition, The Act 516 of Parliament of the Republic of Ghana entitled Children’s Act, 1998 define clearly that a child is any person below age 18. By this estimation, any person born into the world till age 17 is regarded a child in our Ghanaian jurisdiction and as such entitled to the enjoyment of all legal rights guaranteed by the 1992 constitution in relation to children in the state by virtue of their vulnerability

However, it is heart aching to see how some right thinking members of society abuse children against their rights. I recalled one child at age eleven to twelve to come to school one early morning having a big black spot in her face with blood clot on her left eye. Upon several interrogation and persuasion she disclosed that her father did that to her and she was unwilling to tell anyone for the fear of more harm. On another occasion it was a thirteen years old boy in basic five well abused with scars of cane and hand marks on his cheek. He also confirmed it was done to him by his auntie he was staying with. News of child molestation by some parents and guardians has taken up the air space in recent times necessitating the need for child right advocacy and education agenda before it turn ugly.
Unfortunately, most parents and guardians remain in the cloak of ignorance and obvious negligence on the dichotomy of child right. They hold on to the ignorant ascension and asserting that they can do anything they deemed fit to their children without anyone interference.

As much as ignorance of the law is no excuse to the violation of the law, it has twined with impunity hence consolidating and solidifying the ground for child right abuse in our country and across the globe.
Into the bargain, the antidote to ignorance is education and information. It is in this light that I highlight some rights of children enshrined in the Children’s Act, 1998 and how they are conspicuously abused by some parents and guardians knowingly or unknowingly.
The Act, 516 of 1998 Part I (5), maintained that no person shall discriminate against the child on the grounds of gender, race, age, religion, disability, health status, custom, ethnic origin, rural or urban background, not even if the child is a refugee. However, some children in Ghana today, are subjected to direct and indirect discrimination from people in various communities especially based on their religion and rural or urban background. Distribution of the national cake equally is seen in the estimation of rural dwellers as discriminatory since children in the urban areas enjoy more to almost all social amenities; while their counterparts in the cities and towns are sitting on mono and dual desks, their resort to the bare floor for comfort for studies, they have to run home from school for the fear of rain for the fact that they are schooling under trees while children of those same privilege and age study at the comfort of beautiful buildings. Even though this may be considered as a national developmental crisis, it is still placing the rural children at a disadvantaged position against those in the cities.

Similarly, there are parents in our present society who blatantly demonstrate discrimination among their own offspring by showing love and care for some in particular at the detriment of others especially in homes where there is a challenge of rivalry. This leads to low self-esteem and self-confidence among children which lingers on even when they become adults. The girls in such situations tend to seek affection and care from outside the home, a situation which contribute immensely to teenage pregnancy when they encounter male peers and started engaging in elicit relationships. This must be discouraged because the law guarantee every child the love and care of their parents and must not be discriminated against.

In the same vein, there is a common phenomenon in the rural areas which I have witnessed on countless occasion where parents entrust a child into the hand of someone they barely know on agreements such as training them, sending them to school while they serve their mistresses and masters as maids and housekeepers. I remember an agreement of a family relative was for the madam to purchase a sewing machine after about five years to eight years of service under many abusive conditions ranging from hard labour, sexual abuse, discrimination and other inhumane treatment a parent might afford to a child. Meanwhile, The Children’s Act, 516 of 1998 Part I (5), stated that no person shall deny the child the right to live with his or her parents and family and grow up in a caring and peaceful environment unless for given reason such as when the stay of the child with the parents can cause significant harm to the child, when that will cause serious abuse to the child or may not be in the best interest of the child.

Again, negligence on the part of some parents, especially teenager –turned – mothers and fathers. The child under this condition is abused whenever one of these partners decline consent to the relation and intending to leave the relationship, the child is seen as a stumbling block. Some of these conditions are the reasons we see three months and close to a year children abandoned by such parents in gutters and in uncompleted building. On this, the Children’s Act, 516 of 1998 Part I (6) (1), maintained on Parental Duty and Responsibilities that no parent shall deprive a child his or her welfare whether – (a). The parents of the child are married or not at the time of the child’s birth or the parents of the child continue to live together or not. Total ignorance and negligence of this powerful Act led to the unhealthy upbringing of innocent children in an abusive environments.

In addition, many children are still living in certain illegal conditions in various homes; denied access to education, malnourished under starvation as means of punishment, relatively or absolutely naked, unhealthy, and sleeping in poor conditions such as the street, coups and kennels by the orders of some mistresses and masters; at times real parents. Meanwhile, Part I of the Children’s Act 516 of 1998 required that no person shall deprive a child access to education, immunization, adequate diet, and clothing, Shelter, medical attention or any other thing required for his or her development.

Furthermore, in the international front, the old legal cliché of the 1980s that children, women and lunatics are legally incompetent and thus not in position to exercise a wide range of rights on their own behalf is far buried and more civilized legal provisions have located the place for the right of the Child. The General Assembly in 1959 adopted a policy statement on Declaration of the Rights of the Child. This policy emphasized that “mankind owes to the child the best it has to give” The ten principles of the policy reiterate the right of the child to receive special protection, to be given opportunities and facilities to enable him to develop in a healthy and normal manner, to enjoy the benefits of social security, including adequate nutrition, housing, recreation and medical services, to receive education and to be protected against all forms of neglect, cruelty, and exploitation, (Cultural Survival, Inc., 1986). Anything contrary to the aforementioned amounted to abuse of the right of child’s right.

Marriage Vow

WHO TAKES THE MARRIAGE VOW AT THE ALTAR? THE PASTOR OR THE COUPLES?

Wedding vows are crucial and integral part of the entire marriage, in fact what consummates the long time friendship to marriage union is that public vow.

Having attended several wedding ceremonies in Ghana, I have come to observed something very traditional which I think needed a second thought, thus, the way and manner in which we take our marriage vows and the content of the vow itself.
Taking marriage vows have become a tradition rather than love covenant. If I best understand the philosophy behind marriage vows, it is to enable the couples remain committed to the marriage, express their love and not as an exertion of force by any third party but by their will and faith to dwell together till they both decide otherwise. If this is true, then are we sure the standardized vow has captured the feelings and intention of every couple? And must everybody who gets married in Ghana have the same vow? Do we all have the same intention for marriage in this era of complex ideologies?
Very well, like we always would say in the spirit of the pulpit, it is an institution established by God and must be treated as such and I agree to the same believe when it comes to the tenets underpinning marriage. What about the vows? I mean the standardized one. In Genesis 2:23, Adam got up from his deep sleep to see Eve, his helpmate for the first time yet he declared willingly without Gods consent “this is now bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh, she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man” . I belief God was there as a witness and never uttered a word or instruction. To call someone your wife or husband should be out of the individual.
I have a lot of questions bothering my mind and I believe many other individuals are worried too. The priest or pastor who always leads the couples to recite the vows after him, does so after thoroughly reflecting and praying over, but what about the couples who are the main reason for the vow? So the priest or pastor takes the vow first and the actual couples recites like a poem after him without any sober reflection. I believe many people present who have become wedding fanatics equally recite it and even faster than the couples because it is the ritual of the day. Unfortunately, this standard vow is not universal neither does it become necessary in any legal jurisdiction but a Westernized Christian norm.

Time is changing very fast and the generation today has become so complicated and sophisticated with information overload making them question almost everything including those we considered sacred. I had a discussion with a young man who was preparing for marriage few years ago. According to this gentleman, he doesn’t feel comfortable with some portions of the standard vow. As curious as I was, I quickly asked him the exact portions and he made it clear. He said words like “for better, for worse, in health and in sickness, for richer, for poorer” was his problem. He doesn’t understand why the clergy should be leading people to pronounce what he considered curses instead of saying for better for best, in good health and riches. Well that was his opinion but it made sense in a way.

Personal vows must begin to take over from the 1549 prayer by Archbishop Thomas Cranmer in his Book of Common prayers which has become the standardized vow for most Christian marriages. The believer is still praying and will continue to pray so why hold on to someone else’s idea of prayer for marriage? To the Catholic, yes, it is a form of ritual in their belief, what about the others? Personal marriage vows are a pledge of life, soul and faith in the second person that culminate the commitment of the couples like nothing else.
Do we even consider how embarrassing it is for couples who are not well educated to pronounce some of the traditional words like “solemnly” “matrimony” and the others yet we never find any similar and comfortable words in replacement of those? Just because it is a tradition. Must we always conduct it in English as it is commonly found today? The European will not take their vows in Akan or Dagbani so why can’t we use our local language if the need be?

The personal marriage vow can become an official document gazette by the pastor. I believe this should be given to both parties individually to sit down and reflect over its content and prayerfully compose this for the union they are aspiring for. The pastor or priest should be given a copy and the parties allowed to read this maintaining close eye contact before the congregation. On this day, the pastor becomes a representative of God to bear witness to the vows, the congregation serves as witnesses of the vow as it is the true feeling and reflection of their heart and not a traditional.

In my opinion, personal vows should well documented, laminated and given to the couples in addition to their marriage certificate signed by the pastor as a true witness and both parties. The lady must present her vow as well as the man. I believe this way, the couple will understand they owe allegiance to one another and not the priest or pastor.
However, my opinion on personal vows is not to be compared to the emerging system in the western world where the couples are allowed to set the pulpit ablaze with love poems and vows they cannot remember the next minutes and just for the pleasure of those present.
It is time for us to know what defines us as Ghanaians and Africans at large. If we continue practicing religiously, what has been handed over to us by the whites, we’ll always have people saying Christianity is a scheme by the Europeans to serve as opium to the blacks in order to kill their creativity.

WP Radio
WP Radio
OFFLINE LIVE